Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33205/2017bail granted

Dhiro @ Dhiro Singh @ Dhiraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-19Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33205 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2013 Thana -SHEKHPURA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Dhiro @ Dhiro Singh @ Dhiraj Singh, Son of Ram Nandan Singh, Resident of Village- Dhewsa, P.S. and District- Sheikhpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheikhpura (Kusumbha O.P) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2013, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused twice lastly on 22.03.2017 with observation that if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within three months, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. However, more than three months have been passed, but the trial of the petitioner has not been concluded as yet. The petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2013.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33205 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and period of detention, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura (Kusumbha O.P) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2013. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T