Patna High CourtCWJC/1616/2015disposed

Bajrangi Lal Shrivastava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-13Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1616 of 2015 =========================================================== Bajrangi Lal Shrivastava S/o Late Kailash Prasad Shrivastava, Resident of Village + Post - Suhbal, P.S. - Ramgarh, District - Ghazipur State - U.P., Presently psoted as Associate Professor inthe Department of Hindi at Gram Bharati Mahavidyalaya, Ramgarh, a constituent unit of Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna through its Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara through is Vice - Chancellor.

5. The Vice - Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara.

6. The Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara.

7. The Finance Officer, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara.

8. The Principal, Gram Bharati Mahavidayalaya, Ramgarh, Kaimur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-08-2018 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and Veer Kunwar Singh University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University') have assisted the Court.

2. In view of the categorical statement made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the University on 27.02.2018 with regard to the claim for arrears having been calculated and paid to the tune of Rs. 29,16,262/-, the Court finds that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

3. Further, nobody has appeared on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1616 of 2015 dt.13-08-2018 2/2 petitioner to press the writ petition and there is no rejoinder to the aforesaid counter affidavit, copy of which was served on learned counsel for the petitioner on 27.02.2018 itself, the Court can presume that nothing further remains in the writ petition. Accordingly, the same stands disposed off.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR U