Patna High CourtMJC/2116/2015disposed

Ramesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-24Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2116 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13492 of 2008 ====================================================== Ramesh Prasad Son of Sri Vishwa Nath Prasad R/o Village Kesariya Chainpur P.S. Kesariya, District East Champaran at Motihari... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Ashok Sinha The Director Primary Education, Govt of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Jitendra Srivastava, The District Magistrate East Champaran at Motihari

5. Mr. Kumar Sahjanand District Superintendent of Education Now District Programee Officer (Establishment) East Champaran at Motihari

6. Sri Amrendra Kumar, The Block Development Officer, Kesariya, District East Champaran

7. Sri Babu Lal Sahani, Block Education Officer, Kesariya District East Champaran at Motihari

8. Sri Raghuvir Singh Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Kadhan Block Kesariya, District East Champarn at Motihari

9. Sri Mohan Ram The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Kadhan Block Kesariya, District East Champarn at Motihari

10. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Gautam The Head Master Navin Ahirtoli, Ward No. 14 Block Kesariya, District East Champaran

11. Sri Brajesh Kumar Pandey, The Chairman, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, East Champran at Motihai .........................Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 A supplementary show cause has been filed. Let it be kept on record.

Patna High Court MJC No.2116 of 2015(9) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the order has been complied with.

In this view of the matter, this contempt application has become infructuous and, accordingly, it is disposed of. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U