Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53941 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR HARI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sonu Kumar S/o Arjun Sahni R/o Vill- Rasulpur (Rusulpur) Salim, P.S.- Ahiyapur, Distt- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rampuhari P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused was arrested by the police. It is further alleged that one knife has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one country made pistol was recovered from the possession of co-accused person.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53941 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence. No any fire arm has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the motorcycle belongs to the co-accused person and the same is not a stolen one. The petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Rampuhari P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T