Arjun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46295 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -275 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Arjun Singh, Son of Hira Lal Singh, resident of village- Visen Tola, Police Station- Chapra Mufassil, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ----------- 14-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No.275 of 2015 registered under Sections 384, 386, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

The accusation is that on 23.10.2015 in the evening, when the informant was going to market on his motorcycle bearing Registration No.BR-04H-7469, in the way, four persons were seen standing with two motorcycles, who asked the informant to stop his motorcycle. Out of the four persons, one person tried to cause

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46295 of 2016 (3) dt.14-12-2016 2/2 assault to the informant through belt and took the key of the motorcycle of the informant and all the four persons fled away from there taking his motorcycle. The informant claimed to identify this petitioner and one Monu Singh at that time. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has falsely been implicated in this case with an ulterior motive. The looted motorcycle of the informant has not been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within six weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T