Benktesh Sharma @ Hakhanu @ Khakhnu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38392 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2017 Thana -GOH District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== BENKTESH SHARMA @ HAKHANU @ KHAKHNU .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Goh P.S.Case No. 118 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is to assault of the informant by iron rod, causing injury on the head of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is a case and counter case and injury is simple in nature. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38392 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Goh P.S.Case No. 118 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T