Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31139/2017bail granted

Rajesh Kumar @ Devanand v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31139 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2014 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Rajesh Kumar @ Devanand, S/o Late Darogi Mahto, resident of VillageSansarpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of bail in connection with Mansi P.S.Case No.251 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 470, 471 & 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.4.2017 passed in Cr.

Misc.No.16669 of 2017, with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charges in this case. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the charge has been framed in this case and now the petitioner is in custody for about five months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31139 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of observation and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S.Case No.251 of 2014 corresponding to G.R.No.2820 of 2014.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U