Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28360/2017bail granted

Anil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28360 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2015 Thana -DUMARIA District- GAYA ====================================================== Anil Paswan, Son of Jugeshwar Paswan, Resident of Village - Someya, P.S. - Dumariya, District - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2017 in connection with Dumariya P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion as the accused persons including the petitioner are said to have threatened to kill the deceased.

4. Learned A.P.P. on the basis of the case diary submits that witnesses have raised suspicion against the petitioner and other accused persons.

5. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Dumariya P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28360 of 2017 (3) dt.20-07-2017 2/2 (ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T