Abdul Quaiyum @ Quaiyum v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31204 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2017 Thana -JOKIHAT District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Abdul Quaiyum @ Quaiyum son of Md. Kalimuddin resident of village - Boriya, Police Station - Jokihat, District - Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 133 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 461, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 25.04.2017.

Learned counsel for the State could not controvert the above submission.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts., let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31204 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -II, Araria, connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 133 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T