Jamirul Gaddi And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25945 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2014 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

JAMIRUL GADDI and ORS. son of Quamaruddin Gaddi, 2.

Mojamil Ansari son of Khedu Ansari, 3.

Fatma Khatoon wife of Mojamil Ansari, 4.

Quamaruddin Gaddi son of Gowal Gaddi, 5.

Nanhak Gaddi son of Gowal Gaddi, 6.

Gowal Gaddi son of Late Pirtam Gaddi, 7.

Jhalai Khatoon wife of Quamaruddi Gaddi, 8.

Hassantara Khatoon wife of Gowal Gaddi, 9.

Khedu Ansari @ Khedu Mian, son of Late Gafur Ansari, 10.

Rabeya Khatoon wife of Khedu Ansari, 11.

Reyaz Ansari @ Reyaz Mian son of Khedu Ansari, All residents of villagePachamwa, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Oshiyar Gaddi son of Late Jhagru Gaddi, resident of village- Pachamwa, P.S.- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :

Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.03.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 208C of 2014 by which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25945 of 2015(2) dt.14-02-2023 2/2 cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for offence under Sections 323, 341, 448, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the materials available on record, no ground for quashing of the order dated 21.03.2015 taking cognizance against the petitioners offence under Sections 323, 341, 448, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is permitted to withdraw this application to raise all their grievances at the stage of framing of charge, if the charge has not already framed.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) harsh/- U