Sidhnath Ram @ Sidhnath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43874 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2018 Thana -KHAGAUL District- PATNA ======================================================

1. SIDHNATH RAM @ SIDHNATH PRASAD Son of Late Chhedhari Ram R/o Village Haridaspur, PS - Rupaspur, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Nath Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 86/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner that he in connivance of others killed the husband of the informant .

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though he is named in the F.I.R but no specific allegation of overt act has been attributed to him rather the specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Arvind Paswan.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43874 of 2018 (2) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Danapur, Patna in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 86/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T