← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39515/2018bail granted

Nishant Kumar Sharma @ Nishant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39515 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nishant Kumar Sharma @ Nishant Kumar, S/o Prahlad Sharma, R/o VillageKhairwa Bhatoli, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran presently r/o village Raghunathpur Ward No.4, P.S. Turkauliya, District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 313, 406, 354A, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. There is no medical examination report in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39515 of 2018(2) dt.05-07-2018 2/2 support of the allegations made in respect of offence under Section 313 I.P.C. Rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with East Champaran Sadar Mahila P.S. case No.10 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T