Barhan Ravidas And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38357 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2018 Thana -DANIYAWA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Barhan Ravidas

2. Bundela Ravidas @ Bundela .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 22 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the other co-accused person Niranjan is of assault by lathi, danda and knife to the informant and there is allegation of assault against these petitioners also. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is a case and counter case and allegations are of general and omnibus in nature.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38357 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 22 of 2018 to the satisfaction of Smt. Sabita Rani, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City, Patna, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/Priyanka/- U T