Mundrika Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1694 of 2009 ======================================================
1. Mundrika Devi, w/o Anand Thakur, r/o village Sajhuan, P.S. bahera, District Darbhanga
2. Ramesh Jha, s/o Late Shobha Kant Jha, r/o village + P.O. - nawada, P.S. Bahera, District Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, new Secretariat, Patna
3. The Deputy director (Primary Education), Govt. of Bihar, Patna
4. The District Superintendent of Education, Darbhanga
5. The Block Education Extention Officer, Jogiyara, Darbhanga
6. the Regional Education Officer, Kamtoul at Darbhanga
7. the Accountant General, Bihar, at Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AC to G.P. No. 15 as well as learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.
The present writ petition was filed earlier by the wife of the employee who retired in the year 1988 and died in the year 1995. The writ petition was filed in the year 2009 with certain claims.
In this case number of counter affidavits have been filed and finally, by filing counter affidavit in the month of March, 2015, it has been indicated that the differential amount of salary i.e. Rs. 6145/- has already been credited to the account of Sri
Patna High Court CWJC No.1694 of 2009 (8) dt.27-04-2015 2/2 Ramesh Jha, who is petitioner no. 2, in the present writ petition. The petitioner no. 2 is the son of the employee. Learned counsel for the petitioners disputes regarding calculation, however the respondent no. 4 has given chart in paragraph no. 7 of the counter affidavit filed on 12th March, 2015. In view of the facts and circumstances particularly the stand taken in the counter affidavit, I do not find any reason to pass any positive order.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U