Shekh Firaj @ Shekh Firoj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38470 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2013 Thana -PIPRAHI District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Shekh Firaj @ Shekh Firoj, Son of Shekh Havir, Resident of VillageRaghopur (Bahakari), P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 115 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner and others is of committing loot in the house of informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R. his name has surfaced in this case during investigation and that too only on suspicion and except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that in this cases process under Section 82 has already been issued.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38470 of 2018 (2) dt.02-07-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner should surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this court. This application is accordingly disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T