Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45235/2017bail granted

Deepak Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45235 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45235 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -402 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Deepak Kumar Verma Son of Dilip Verma, Resident of Village-Dhanai Saso, P.S.-Ratu, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barachatti P.S Case No. 402 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 25(1-B)A/26 of the Arms Act and Section 30(A), 38 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 112 litres of foreing liquor from the Honda City car in which the petitioner and other accused persons were traveling.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and he is not the owner of the said car from which the alleged recovery has been made and further no incriminating article has been recovered attracting the penal provisions of Arms Act. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 11.07.2017

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45235 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S Case No. 402 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T