Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43439 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43439 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. PINTU SINGH @ PINTU KUMAR SINGH

2. ABU SINGH BOTH SON OF VIJENDRA SINGH

3. VISHAL SINGH SON OF RAJESHWAR SINGH @ RAJESH SINGH ALL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DHANECHHA, P.S. - DURGAWATI, DISTRICT - KAIMUR AT BHABUA .... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das(Spl.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Durgawati P.S. Case No. 130 of 2015 registered under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 435 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(10) of the S.C./S.T. Act pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur.

The accusation of informant, Rajendra Pasi, is that when petitioners along long with five to seven persons came at his Tari shop and demanded Tari then informant served him. Thereafter, petitioners and others again made demand of Tari then

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43439 of 2015 (2) dt.14-10-2015 informant told them to give after drinking water but petitioners along with others started to abuse him. Thereafter, informant left his Tari shop and went at his home where petitioners and others came there and started to assault him through Lathi, Danda and stick and set on fire in his hut.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioners are directed to surrender before the trial court within six weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T