Pankaj Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26171 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2013 Thana -BELDAUR District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Pankaj Yadav, son of late Satyanarayan Yadav.

2. Hari Yadav, Son of Asarfi Yadav, Both are Resident of Village Mahinath Nagar, Police Station Beldaur, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2013, registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners' names have surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and that too after two years from the date of alleged occurrence and except that there is nothing against the petitioners. Further petitioners have been in judicial custody since 27.11.2016 and 26.10.2016 respectively. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above fact and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand)eah with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -III, Khagaria, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26171 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2013, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds. It is also made clear that if the petitioners' active participation is found in such type of cases, in future, their bail bonds will be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T