Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43834/2017bail granted

Pannalal Singh @ Pannalal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43834 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43834 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2017 Thana -DARPA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. PANNALAL SINGH @ PANNALAL SAH Son of Late Ramchandra Singh, R/o Village- Sukhlahiya, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 39 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 216 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and his name has surfaced on confessional statement of co-accused and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 22.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43834 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 39 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T