Bikram Dom @ Vikram Dom v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46777 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -530 Year- 2015 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Bikram Dom @ Vikram Dom, Son of Late Rajendra Dom, Resident of Village- Kharidi Bigha, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 530 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is of committing theft in the mobile shop of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R and his name has been disclosed by the co-accused of this case and except there is nothing against him and though some mobile has been recovered from his but the same has not been put on Test Identification Parade. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 06.04.2017 and so far criminal antecedent is concerned he is accused in four more cases but he is on bail in those cases and other co-accused of this case has already

been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.12.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54218 of 2015. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thosuand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Nawada, in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 530 of 2015,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(iv) Further petitioner has to appear before the concerned police station in the first week of each month for a period of one year so that the police may watch his conduct.

It is made clear that failure to comply any of the above order shall make the petitioner liable for cancellation fo his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T