Ram Bahadur Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43789 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2018 Thana -HASANPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Ram Bahadur Mahto, son of Late Mahabir Mahto.

2. Bino Mahto @ Bindeshwari Mahto, son of Ram Bahadur Mahto.

3. Bhola Mahto, son of Ram Bahadur Mahto.

4. Mukund Mahto, son of Ram Bahadur Mahto.

5. Chotan Mahto, son of Ram Bahadur Mahto.

6. Kamleshwari Mahto, son of Late Chalitar Mahto.

7. Sita Ram Mahto, son of Late Chalitar Mahto.

8. Lalo Mahto, son of Late Chalitar Mahto.

9. Chandan Mahto, son of Late Ghoghan Mahto.

10. Arun Mahto, son of Rameshwar Mahto.

11. Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Mahto, son of Badal Mahto. All are resident of Village- Goriari, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dashrath Mehta, A.PP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Hasanpur P.S.Case No. 01 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the son of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the specific allegation of assault has been made against co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43789 of 2018 (3) dt.26-07-2018 2/2 accused, Rameshwar Mahto and Subodh Mahto and there is no specific allegation have been attributed against these petitioners and they are eleven in numbers and admittedly the land dispute is going on between the parties.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, surrender be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addditional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Rosera , Samastipur in connection with Hasanpur P.S.Case No. 01 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T