← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16677/2019disposed

Ravi Shankar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16677 of 2019 ====================================================== Ravi Shankar S/o Kaushal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village-Gonawa,P.O. Sadisopur, P.S. Naubatpur, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 2.

The Director, Land Acquisition and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar,Patna 3.

The District Magistrate, Patna 4.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Patna 5.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Mechancial Work Shop Campus, Near Airport, Sheikhpura,Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad, GP-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and and learned counsel representing the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"(i) for a direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of the compensation of the land of the petitioners under the new act which is Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2018 which come in force from 1st January 2014 with penal

Patna High Court CWJC No.16677 of 2019(6) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 interest. The land of the petitioners has been acquired by the respondent authorities for construction of Road "Bihta-Sarmera State Highway No. 78".

(ii) for any other relief/reliefs if petitioner found entitle in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time, the writ petition is become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as become infructuous.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U