Guddu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37170 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2017 Thana- MASRAKH District- Saran ====================================================== Guddu Rai S/o Sri Paras Rai R/o Village- Chand Kudariya Teliya Tola, P.S. Mashrak, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. RAM BILASH ROY RAMAN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 600 litres of spirit were recovered from the house of the co-accused Arjun Rai and 700 litre of spirit were recovered from the house of coaccused Bishundeo Rai. It is urged that no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. However, petitioner was apprehend only on the suspicion that he lives with the aforesaid persons. Petitioner claims that he is in custody since 22.6.2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37170 of 2017(4) dt.25-08-2017 2/3 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge VI - cum - Special Judge, Excise Act, Saran at Chapra in connection with Masrakh P.S. Case No. 166 of 2017.

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Saran within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37170 of 2017(4) dt.25-08-2017 3/3 by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T