← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55432/2022allowed

Pintu Panday v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-17Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55432 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2021 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Pintu Pandey Son Of Surenddra Pandey @ Surrendar Pandey R/O VillageSarfara P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 229 of 2021 registered under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in brief is that the informant is running CSP of Central Bank of India, on the date of occurrence, four miscreants armed with weapon came and looted Rs. one lakh and three mobiles from there and fled away after firing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this present case. The petitioner is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55432 of 2022(3) dt.17-02-2023 2/2 named in F.I.R. rather his name has been transpired in this case from Barauli P.S. Case No. 249 of 2021 on the basis of his self confessional statement, and after that he has been remanded in this case. Neither anything incriminating or stolen article has been recovered from his possession nor he has been put on T.I.P. He is languishing in judicial custody since 23.09.2021. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 229 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I Gopalganj. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T