← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56279/2025bail granted

Md. Tanvir Rain @ Tanvir @ Tanveer v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56279 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Tanvir Rain @ Tanvir @ Tanveer S/O Md. Rafique R/O Village- Harine, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Anisha Khatoon D/O Nasirul Miyan R/O Village- Itarharba, P.S- Harlakhi, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Soban Asghar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP For the OP-2 :

Ms.Kumari Pallavi & Mr. Manoj Kr.Pandey,Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 115(2), 303(2), 316(2), 85, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 4,50,000/- (Rupees four lacs fifty thousand), as full and final settlement amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave her consent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56279 of 2025(3) dt.17-12-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Benipatti, District - Madhubani in connection with C.R. No. 397 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S. with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, learned Court below would be at liberty to cancel the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56279 of 2025(3) dt.17-12-2025 3/3 bail-bond of the petitioner.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T