Parma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65193 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2021 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

PARMA YADAV Son of Madan Yadav Resident of Village - Hakam, Police Station - Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva O.P.), District - Siwan. 2.

Rama Shankar Yadav Son of Kedar Chaudhari Resident of Village - Hakam, Police Station - Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva O.P.), District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva) P.S. Case no. 249 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 384, 325, 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, on refusal by the informant to give extortion money amounting to Rs. two lac to the accused persons, they came at his house and on order of petitioner no. 2, Mukesh Yadav assaulted the informant at his mouth resulting into broken of his teeth and head injury and has also snatched Rs. 90,000/- from the pocket of the informant. Petitioner no.1 assaulted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65193 of 2021(2) dt.13-07-2022 2/2 to his father with iron rod, resulting into finger injury. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from their possession. Injury received by father of the informant on finger of left hand, which is attributed to petitioner no. 1, is non-vital organ. They have got no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva) P.S. Case no. 249 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U