Randhir Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57457 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2007 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Randhir Singh S/O Late Shatrughan Prasad Singh R/O Village- Baherwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ranjana Devi W/o Randhir Singh Village- Baherwa, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. At Present R/O Gangjala Gautamnagar, P.S.- Saharsa, Dist.- Saharsa.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Satyapal Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP For Opposite Party No. 2:

N o n e ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Despite filing Vakalatnama, no one appears on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.

3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 420, 494, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The prosecution case, in nutshell, is that marriage of the informant was solemnized with this petitioner in the year 1977 as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is alleged that after marriage, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, subjected the informant to torture and harassment due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57457 of 2025(3) dt.25-11-2025 2/3 to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and subsequently, ousted her from her matrimonial house.

5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because happens to be husband of the informant and present case has been lodged due to petty family dispute. There are general and omnibus allegations. As a matter of fact, the petitioner at no point of time demanded any dowry or committed torture. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to keep the daughter of informant, as his wife, with full honour and dignity. It is next submitted that the case is triable by the Magistrate. In this connection, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57457 of 2025(3) dt.25-11-2025 3/3 bail to the petitioner is allowed.

8. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 316 of 2007, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T