← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40243/2018bail granted

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-06Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40243 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1360 Year- 2014 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad aged about 30 years son of Sri Pramod Prasad, resident of Mohalla-at present resident of Gayghat, Dakshini Gali, P.S. Alamganj, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Radha Devi, wife of Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Prasad, and daughter of Raju Prasad of Mohalla-Didarganj, P.S. Katra Bazar, P.S. Didarganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Akbar Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 498(A) of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40243 of 2018 (2) dt.06-07-2018 2/2 case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Patna City, Patna, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1360 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T