Jainarain Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4853 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Jainarain Sah, Son of Sheonath Sah

2. Lalita Devi, W/O Jai Narayan Sah Both are residents of village-Jeetpur, P.S-Chhauradano,Distt.-East Champaran .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Gautam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shanker Pd.Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 05-02-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are in custody since 26.11.2014 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304 (B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is that the accused including the petitioners demanded a motor vehicle as dowry and due to nonfulfillment of the dowry, daughter of the informant was killed by setting her on fire.

It is submitted that the petitioners are the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased. The deceased was cooking food and she became injured by fire and she was taken to the hospital and during treatment, she died and thereafter cremation was made in presence of the informant and others. When the informant came to know that the deceased got burn injury while she was cooking,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4853 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015 he filed a compromise petition in the court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Motihari.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champraran in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 103 of 2013 with the following conditions:

1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioners.

2. The petitioners will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3. The petitioners will be well represented in the court.

4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, their bail bonds will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J.) Vats/- U T