Md.Afroz @ Guddu v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5469 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -465 Year- 2014 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Md.Afroz @ Guddu Son of Md. Ismail resident of village - Dumri, P.S. Musahari, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Farida Khatoon Daughter of Md. Ibrahim Resident of Goverdhanpur, P.O. Siho, P.S. Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-02-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 342, 448, 498A and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is to have demanded dowry and for non-fulfilment of demand of dowry, the informant has been tortured by the accused including the petitioner.
It is submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the informant and both of them were leading a happy conjugal life and a daughter was born out of their wedlock. Later on, due to some difference the informant does not want to lead conjugal life with the petitioner and the daughter is also with the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5469 of 2015 (2) dt.10-02-2015 2/2 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in Sakra P. S. Case no. 465 of 2014 with the following conditions :
1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.
3.
The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/- U T