Ekramul Haque @ Tunnu Daroga v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55128 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Ekramul Haque @ Tunnu Daroga S/o Late Wasiul Haque R/o vill - Nohsa, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mayank Raj, Advocate Mr. Rabindra Kumar , Advocate Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate Mr. Ramakant Sharma, senior Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP For informant :
Mr. Jagjit Roushan, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per F.I.R. co-accused (1) Afsar Khan, (2) Sharukh Khan, (3) Akhtar Ali @ Golden, (4) Ameer Jalal, & (5) Aftab Mallik fired bullets upon the husband of the informant, as a result of which, he died due to bullet injury. The informant suspects that this petitioner alongwith 9 other co-accused persons have conspired with aforesaid five accused and got the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55128 of 2025(3) dt.28-11-2025 2/2 husband of informant killed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific accusation of firing is against other co-accused persons. Petitioner is only alleged to be conspirator. Informant is not eyewitness to the occurrence and only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since One of the co-accused namely , Md. Tanvir Alam who was one of the conspirator has already been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 25.08.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 55724 of 2025 .
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail petition.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Patna in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 779 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T