Saurabh Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16022 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Saurabh Kumar Ram Son of Satya Narayan Ram Resident of VillageTahadiya, P.O.-Dumri, P.S.-Barahiya, District-Lakhisarai 2.
Sunita Kumari Wife of Late Prakash Rajak Resident of Village-Mananpur Bazar, P.O.-Mananpur Bazar, Near Railway Station, P.S.-Chanan (Itaun), District-Lakhisarai.
3.
Lalita Kumari Wife of Arun Kumar Resident of Village-Sherpur Chaukhandi, Ward No.5, P.S.-Basdevpur, District-Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. 3.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Education Department, Lakhisarai 4.
The Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat-Raj Itoun, Block-Chanan, DistrictLakhisarai. 5.
The Headmaster, primary School, Rampur Tand, Village-Itoun, BlockChanan, District-Lakhisarai. 6.
The Headmaster, Primary School, Banu Bagicha, Dom Toli, Village-Itoun, Block-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rashid Izhar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra ( SC 16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2022 Heard the parties through virtual mode.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for direction to the respondents to comply with the order passed by the District Appellate Authority order dated 28.12.2020 and order dated 05.06.2022 passed by the Panchayat Secretary Employment Unit.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16022 of 2022(2) dt.25-11-2022 2/2
2. Keeping in view the provisions of Rule 16 of The Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Disputes Redressal and Appeal) Rules, 2020, the petitioner is left free to move appropriate application before the concerned District Appellate Authority laid for implementing orders of the District Appellate Authority or State Appellate Authority would not lie before this Court.
4. The writ petition is dismissed with aforesaid liberty. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 49 U