Rajendra Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44096 of 2018 Arising out of P.S.Case No. -508 Year- 2017 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Rajendra Ram, S/o Late Tetar Ram,
2. Lalan Ram S/o Rajendra Ram,
3. Sumit Ram @ Sumit Kumar S/o Rajendra Ram, All Residents of Vill.- Bahadarpur, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case no. 508 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 448, 323, 504, 506 and 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of assault by lathi, danda and spade to the informant, causing injury on the head and right hand.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and moreover, injuries are simple in nature, caused by hard and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44096 of 2018 (2) dt.26-07-2018 2/2 blunt substance (Annexure-2) and in this regard supplementary affidavit has been filed.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 508/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T