Chintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58302 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2024 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Chintu Kumar son of Umesh Rai Village -Mahisautha Khanua tola PS -Bokhra (Nanpur), Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case, but then, the said case was instituted by the present informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant alleges that his minor daughter aged about 17 years was kidnapped by the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the petitioner and the victim
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58302 of 2025(3) dt.11-09-2025 2/3 were in love. It is also submitted that though in the FIR it is alleged that victim is a minor aged about 17 years, but then, victim is a major. It is also submitted that petitioner and the victim eloped and they married. The victim came back her statement was recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she did not support the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that even the learned trial Court released her on her own volition and thereafter, she came back to the petitioner where she is staying. It is further submitted that victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has clearly stated that she was in love with the petitioner and they have married. It is next submitted that out of the wedlock, a child was born who presently is staying with the petitioner and the victim.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58302 of 2025(3) dt.11-09-2025 3/3 & Sessions Judge-VI-cum- Special Court, POCSO, Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur P. S. Case No.60 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T