Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65897 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2021 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR Son of Rajmani Rai Resident of Village - Sadapur Mahua, Ward No.-15, P.S. - Mahua, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s) as pointed out by the office, it any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Mahua P.S. Case No. 353 of 2021, registered for the offence under Section 30(a), 32(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not stayed at the place of occurrence, he was at his maternal grandfather village. This fact has been supported by the local villagers who has given certificate regarding the same in that view of the matter, petitioner is granted anticipatory bail till submission of charge-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65897 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 sheet.

Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-IIcum-Excise Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 353 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with a condition that petitioner will join the investigation and produce all the evidences oral or documentary with regard to his stay in his maternal grandfather village and if the I.O. comes to the conclusion that the petitioner was not stayed in the village and petitioner not continue with the investigation till submission of charge-sheet, then the Court below is at liberty to cancel his anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U T