← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19525/2021withdrawn

Shubhendu Anand v. The Branch Manager, Main Branch, State Bank Of India

2022-02-01The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19525 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Shubhendu Anand Son of Sri Dilip Kumar Proprietor of M/s Anand Drug Enterprises, Usha Bhawan, Ward No. 21, Jai Prakash Nagar, Khagaria, P.O. and P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria.

2.

Dilip Kumar Son of Late Ramakant Poddar Resident of Jai Prakash Nagar, Khagaria, P.O. and P.S.- Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Branch Manager, Main Branch, State Bank of India Khagaria, PO, P.S. and District- Khagaria.

2.

The Chief General Manager, Associate Subsidiary Department, State Bank of India, Corporate Centre, 4th Floor, State Bank Bhawan, Kadwa Cama Road, Mumbai- 400021.

3.

The Zonal Manager, State Bank of India (SARB), South Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kaushal Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ajay Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) Date : 01-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners have prayed for following relief(s):-

Patna High Court CWJC No.19525 of 2021 dt.01-02-2022 2/3 It is submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioners in presence of learned counsel for the Bank that due to subsequent events, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw

Patna High Court CWJC No.19525 of 2021 dt.01-02-2022 3/3 this writ petition.

Permission is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty reserved to petitioners to approach the court, if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date