Rojidan Khatoon @ Rojdin Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58489 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2023 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

ROJIDAN KHATOON @ ROJDIN KHATOON wife of Md. Subjan Village- Ganipura Bejha Ps- Sakra Dist- Muzaffarpur 2.

RIZWANA KHATOON D/o- Md. Subjan Village- Ganipura Bejha Ps- Sakra Dist- Muzaffarpur 3.

NAZRANA KHATOON D/o- Md. Subjan Village- Ganipura Bejha PsSakra Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 09-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with their family members have tortured the informant's daughter for non-fulfillment of additional dowry demand and ultimately she was being killed by the accused persons and with a view to wipe off the evidence, they threw her dead body in a nearby pokhar. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are sister-in-law of the deceased and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58489 of 2023(3) dt.09-10-2023 2/2 been falsely implicated in this case. They had never demanded any thing from the deceased or her parents. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not against his family members. Husband is in judicial custody. All the petitioners are living separately and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and are languishing in judicial custody since 2.6.2023.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-XII, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 230 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U