Priyanka Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14107 of 2013 =========================================================== Priyanka Kumari Wife of Manoj Kumar Sah, resident of village- Magha Gaddi Tola, Police Station - Magha Garh, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj.

2. The District Programme Officer, MANREGA, Gopalganj, District - Gopalganj

3. The Chief Development Programme Officer, Magha, Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. SANJAY Mr. Amaresh Kr. Sinha, AC to GA-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-12-2016 When the case was called out on 9th November 2016, no one was present on behalf of the petitioner. Even today no one is present for the petitioner to press this petition. The counsel for the State is present.

The Court has no other alternative but to dispose of this petition which relates to the appointment of Anganwari Sevika. From the letter no. 457 dated 4th March 2013 issued by the Office of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gopalganj it appears that on enquiry, a report was submitted by the Sub-Divisional Officer where he has informed that the entire proceeding is suffering from illegality and so much so that Aam Sabha could not be completed on account of

Patna High Court CWJC No.14107 of 2013 dt.01-12-2016 2/2 the fact that some disturbance was created by the villager inasmuch as coram was also not completed and was suggested that the step should be taken for fresh selection.

The counsel for the State submits that the aforesaid letter indicates that the entire process of selection was tainted, cannot be legalised.

It appears that the fresh process of selection was started and must have been completed by the I.C.D.S. and the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this petition, in such view of the matter, this petition is dismissed.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 06/12/2016 Transmission Date