Birendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55358 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2022 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Birendra Ram Son of Shohrai Ram Resident of Village- Dhankadha, P.SSasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas 2.

Ravi Ram Son of Faguni Ram Resident of Village- Dhankadha, P.SSasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas 3.

Chandan Ram son of Surendra Ram Resident of Village- Dhankadha, P.SSasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas 4.

Saroj Ram Late Fulkar Ram Resident of Village- Dhankadha, P.S- Sasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas 5.

Nirmal Ram @ Jaishree Ram Son of Late Ramdev Ram Resident of VillageDhankadha, P.S- Sasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas 6.

Shambhu Kumar Son of Panchu Ram Resident of Village- Dhankadha, P.SSasaram (M), Dhaudhadh (O.P.), District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 147, 149, 323, 325, 307, 337, 427 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner no. 1, 2, 3 and 6 have criminal antecedents while petitioner no. 4 and 5 have clean antecedent. There is case and counter case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55358 of 2022(2) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and materials available on record as both sides have sustained injuries, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 65 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Shahnawaz/- U T