Chunna Singh @ Puspendar Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55357 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2022 Thana- JAMHOR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Chunna Singh @ Puspendar Kumar Singh Son of Janeshwar @ Bhikhari Singh Resident of Village- Mordihri, P.S.- Jamhore, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (amendment) Act, 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather 23.04 liters of foreign liquor is said to have recovered from a Alto car of which petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55357 of 2022(2) dt.18-11-2022 2/2 the owner. He submits that allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused managed to ran away leaving the vehicle. He further submits that local police was putting pressure for undue advantage and upon non-fulfillment the petitioner has been implicated in this case He submits that petitioner has two criminal antecedent in similar nature as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case and the fact that petitioner is the owner of the said vehicle, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 217/2022. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T