Feku Yadav @ Fekan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47480 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -440 Year- 2017 Thana -HILSA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Feku Yadav @ Fekan S/o Lorik Yadav, resident of Village- Bhawani Bigha, Police Station- Chiksohra, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 30-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2017 in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 440 of 2017 for the alleged offences under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and the articles recovered from the house of the petitioner were merely articles of clothing and kitchen utensils belonging to the petitioner. The valuables such as Jewelry etc., said to have been stolen have not been recovered from the house of the petitioner who claims clean antecedents. Co-accused Sahendra Yadav has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 45345 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47480 of 2017 (2) dt.30-10-2017 No. 440 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T