Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46117/2018bail granted

Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-16Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46117 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2018 Thana -NAUBATPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Raj Kumar aged about 30 Years (Deputy Mukhiya Naudiha Panchayat ) S/o Arun Singh, R/o Vill.- Paltu Chhatni, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 71/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 448, 323, 353, 385, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. The petitioner is Up-Mukhiya of Naudiha Panchayat. Other co-accused with similar allegation has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 44879/2018 dated 08.08.2018.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46117 of 2018 (2) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 71/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. II, Danapur, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.)