Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6065/2015bail granted

Sahim Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-18Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6065 of 2015 (2) dt.18-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6065 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2013 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Sahim Mian Son of Gulli Mian Resident of village - Dudhiyava Ojha Tola, P.S. Paharpur, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail which has already been rejected vide order dated 13.8.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26653 of 2014 on the ground that the informant and another witness Parma Prasad both have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 17.4.2014, and as such in the light of earlier observation the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

Considering the aforesaid fact that the informant and another witness Parma Prasad have not supported the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6065 of 2015 (2) dt.18-02-2015 allegation of demand of dowry, now the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 11th Additional Sessions Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in Sessions Trial No. 660 of 2014 arising out of Paharpur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T