Anish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39066 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -232 Year- 2014 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Anish Kumar Singh, Son of Shri Ram Lakhan Singh Resident of VillageBabui Tola, P.S.-Bagahan, District-West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mitali For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 232 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, however, it appears from order sheet that cognizance has been taken under Section 382 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is nothing against the petitioner save and except confessional statement. Further no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and other similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.12.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54656 of 2015 and petitioner has been in judicial custody since 16.08.2014. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 232 of 2014,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) Petitioner shall mark his attendance in the concerned police station in the first week of each month at least for a period of one year so that the police may watch his conduct during that period.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates

without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the S.P. of concerned district.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T