Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56111/2025dismissed

Anand Murti @ Pintu @ Chintu v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56111 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2022 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Anand Murti @ Pintu @ Chintu S/o Late Kusheshwar Mahto R/o VillageBandhara, PS- Dalsinghsarai (Ghataho OP), District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the 3rd attempt of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dalsinghsarai (Ghataho O.P.) P.S. Case No. 172 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 364, 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected twice on 29.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 78117 of 2023 and on 08.01.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 88014 of 2024. The order dated 08.01.2025 reads as follows:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dalsinghsarai (Ghataho) P.S.

Case No. 172 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and later Sections 364, 302, 201 and 34 of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56111 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 Indian Penal Code were also added.

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial of the petitioner has almost concluded and the case is now fixed for judgment.

4. Considering the fact that the trial of the petitioner is completed and the case is now fixed for judgment, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that only one witness is left to be examined.

5. In view of the above, this application for regular bail stands rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T