Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44815/2017bail granted

Gonaur Sahani And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44815 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44815 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2017 Thana -HATHAURI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Gonaur Sahani, S/o Chulhai Sahani

2. Md. Habib, S/o Md. Illiyas Both resident of Village- Bhadai, Dhobi Tola P.S.- Hathhauri, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 123 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 17.5 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 30.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44815 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge - CumSpecial Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 123 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T