Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65600 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== AJIT KUMAR S/o Brij Nandan Pd. Singh Resident of Village - Narhi, P.S. Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP Mr. Amrendra Narayan Rai, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 406, 420, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the informant transferred Rs.3,00,000/- to the account of the petitioner Ajit Kumar and gave Rs.2,00,000/- in the hands of co-accused Mukesh for purchasing a land. The petitioner did not gave any type of account about the money of the informant. It is further alleged that on instance for money, co-accused Mukesh denied to return the money and also threatened to kill him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65600 of 2021(4) dt.10-11-2022 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is the director of the company Shree Keshav Krishna Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and the informant had transferred money in the account of the company and not in the individual account of petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

Petitioner is agreed to deposit Rs.3,00,000/- in learned court below subject to final outcome of the present case i.e. criminal case.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65600 of 2021(4) dt.10-11-2022 3/3 below where the case is pending/Successor Court in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.514 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

However, the bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after deposit of Rs.3,00,000/- in the learned court below. The said amount will be subject to the final outcome of the criminal case.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T