Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33108 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2016 Thana -PARSA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Singh son of Mishri Lal Singh

2. Sukhari Singh son of Late Chandrika Singh. Both resident of Village Bhikhari Chapra, P.s. Parsa, District Saran .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 211 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners being the father and cousin respectively of the deceased, have been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against unknown persons. It is submitted that the deceased had committed suicide and there is no material to connect the petitioners with the alleged occurrence. Similarly situated co-accused Dharmendra Kumar has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 10075 of 2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-13, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 211 of 2016 on the following conditions :- (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33108 of 2017 (3) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 shall be their close relative other than the petitioners herein. (ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T