Ambika Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15725 of 2013 =========================================================== Ambika Ram Son Of Late Khedaru Ram Resident Of Village - Meuli, P.O. Raasar, P.S. Pakari, Distt. - Ballia ( U.P. ) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through Energy Secretary, Government of Bihar.
2. The Chief Managing Director Of The Bihar State Power ( Holding ) Company Ltd., Patna
3. The General Manager Cum Chief Engineer, Central Electric Supply Area Patna
4. The Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle Rohtas
5. The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division Dehri - On - Sone
6. Assistant Engineer, Electric Supply Sub - Division Dehri - On - Sone .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Harendra Nath Ojha, Adv. For the S.B.P.D.C.L. : Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, AC to SC-20 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
As has been claimed by the petitioner as well as in the order of this Court, the petitioner has been found to be working for the period 22.9.1998 to 25.9.1998 and from 23.4.1999 to 17.11.1999. Accordingly, for the aforesaid period, the amount of salary has been calculated to the tune of Rs. 28,090/- and, accordingly, the pay-order has been raised in the name of the petitioner of the State Bank of India and the details of his entitlement is also attached with the letter dated 16.12.2016.
Let this pay-order be handed over to the learned counsel
Patna High Court CWJC No.15725 of 2013 dt.20-12-2016 for the petitioner and the photocopy of the letter dated 16.12.2016 with the breakups as also copy of the pay-order issued by the State Bank of India be kept on record for future reference. In view of the above, there is no need to proceed further. If the petitioner has still any grievance, he may raise the same before the authority concerned who will take a decision in accordance with law.
With the aforementioned observation, this writ application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.01.2017 Transmission Date