Raju Ranjan Paswan @ Raju Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57381 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2023 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAJU RANJAN PASWAN @ RAJU PASWAN Son of Hari Narayan Ram Resident of Village-Dharupur, Police Station-Bikramganj, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant was coming with his motorcycle and reached near railway gumti, accused Ravi Sharkar and one unknown person snatched his motorcycle on knife point and fled away. Later on petitioner was apprehended by the police while he was riding on the alleged stolen motorcycle as a pillion rider.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57381 of 2023(3) dt.01-11-2023 2/2 the petitioner is named in the FIR not put on TIP. Petitioner has taken lift from accused Ravi Shankar and Govind Kumar without knowing the fact that the said motorcycle is stolen one. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged looted motorcycle. Moreover, this case is triable by judicial magistrate. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.04.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 217 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U